From 442c9efa4b176ff2c4c89a43beac3ea3fad247d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kaz Kylheku Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:28:01 -0800 Subject: * eval.c (rest_s, op_s): New variables. (do_eval_args): Allow calls specified by improper lists like (x y . z) where the z expression must evaluate to a list that turns into addition arguments to be applied. (transform_op, expand_op): New static functions. (expand): Call expand_op. (eval_init): Initialize rest_s and op_s. Use rest_s to register rest function. * lib.c (gensym): New function based on gensymv. (gensymv): Now calls gensym. * lib.h (gensym): Declared. * parser.l: Parse @ followed by digits as a new kind of token, METANUM. * parser.y (METANUM): New token. (meta_expr, exprs): Missing rlcp's added. (expr): METANUM variant introduced. (yybadtoken): Handle METANUM. * txr.1: Documented one-symbol argument list of lambda. Documented op. Closed some unbalanced parentheses. * txr.vim: Highlight op. --- txr.1 | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'txr.1') diff --git a/txr.1 b/txr.1 index e5f05cd9..dc625a47 100644 --- a/txr.1 +++ b/txr.1 @@ -3612,7 +3612,7 @@ as the final filter in a chain, it must produce a string. For instance, the following is a valid filter function: - @(define foo_to_bar (in out) + @(define foo_to_bar (in out)) @ (next :string in) @ (cases) foo @@ -3776,7 +3776,7 @@ take precedence. No warning is issued. The syntax of the filter directive is: - @(filter FILTER { VAR }+ } + @(filter FILTER { VAR }+ ) A filter is specified, followed by one or more variables whose values are filtered and stored back into each variable. @@ -4361,7 +4361,7 @@ in the quote stands for itself, except for the ,(+ 2 2) which is evaluated. The comma-star operator is used within a quoted list to denote a splicing unquote. Wheras the quote suppresses evaluation, the comma introduces an exception: the form which follows ,* must evaluate to a list. That list is spliced into -the quoted list. For example: '(a b c ,*(list (+ 3 3) (+ 4 4) d) evaluates +the quoted list. For example: '(a b c ,*(list (+ 3 3) (+ 4 4) d)) evaluates to (a b c 6 8 d). The expression (list (+ 3 3) (+ 4 4)) is evaluated to produce the list (6 8), and this list is spliced into the quoted template. @@ -4545,6 +4545,8 @@ Syntax: (lambda ({}*[. ]) {}*) + (lambda {}*) + .TP Description: @@ -4555,7 +4557,7 @@ et cetera. The first argument of lambda is the list of parameters for the function. It may be empty, and it may also be an improper list (dot notation) where the -terminating atom is a symbol other than nil. +terminating atom is a symbol other than nil. It can also be a single symbol. The second and subsequent arguments are the forms making up the function body. The body may be empty. @@ -4565,7 +4567,8 @@ are visible to the body forms. The variables are initialized from the values of the argument expressions appearing in the function call. The dotted notation can be used to write a function that accepts -a variable number of arguments. +a variable number of arguments. To write a function that accepts +variable arguments only, with no required arguments, use a single symbol. Functions created by lambda capture the surrounding variable bindings. @@ -4585,6 +4588,75 @@ are aggregated into a list passed as the single parameter z: (lambda (x y . z) (list 'my-arguments-are x y z)) +Variadic funcion: + + (lambda args (list 'my-list-of-arguments args)) + +.SS Operator op + +.TP +Syntax: + + (op {
}+) + +.TP +Description: + +Like the lambda operator, the op operator creates an anonymous function. +The difference is that the arguments of the function are implicit, or +optionally specified within the function body. + +Also, the arguments of op are implicitly turned into a DWIM expression, +which means that argument evaluation follows Lisp-1 rules. (See the dwim +operator below). + +The argument forms are arbitrary expressions, within which a special +convention is permitted: + +.IP @ + +A number preceded by a @ is a metanumber. This is a special syntax +which denotes an argument. For instance @2 means that the second argument of +the anonymous function is to be substituted in place of the @2. If @2 is used +it means that @1 also has to appear somewhere, otherwise the op +construct is erroneous. + +.IP @rest + +The meta-symbol @rest indicates that any trailing arguments to the +function are to be inserted. If the @ syntax is not used anywhere, +it means that the function only has trailing arguments. If @1 is used, +it means that the second and subsequent arguments are trailing arguments. +If @rest is not used anywhere, then the rest arguments are automatically +applied to the op form. If @rest appears, then this is suppressed. + +The actions of form may be understood by these examples, which show +how op is rewritten to lambda. However, note that the real translator +uses generated symbols for the arguments, which are not equal to any +symbols in the program. + + (op) -> invalid + + ;; n-ary function that turns all its arguments into a list + + (op +) -> (lambda rest [+ . rest]) + + (op @1 @2) -> (lambda (arg1 arg2 . rest) [arg1 arg2 . rest]) + + (op foo @1 (@2) (bar @3)) -> (lambda (arg1 arg2 arg3 . rest) + [foo arg1 (arg2) (bar arg3) . rest]) + + (op foo @rest @1) -> (lambda (arg1 . rest) [foo rest arg1]) + +.TP + +Examples: + + ;; Take a list of pairs and produce a list in which those pairs + ;; are reversed. + + (mapcar (op list @2 @1) '((1 2) (a b))) -> ((2 1) (b a)) + .SS Operator call .TP -- cgit v1.2.3